Win! Creation ‘science’ banned in UK state-funded nurseries

The headline of Friday’s Daily Telegraph screamed “Toddlers at risk from extremists“. The British Education Secretary has announced plans to ban teaching creationism is publicly-funded nurseries.

What it didn’t say is that, although the British Humanist Association (BHA) was the most prominent campaigner against creationism in nurseries, this was originally the subject of a letter-writing campaign by the readers of Leaving Fundamentalism. But I know you wrote the letters, so thank you.

We won.

Here’s a brief history of what has happened, and what it means. More importantly, an article in the TES last week may explain why ACE schools have been able to get away with so much.

Screen Shot 2014-08-10 at 17.18.33


On March 8, 2013, this blog ran a post called Government money for ACE schools in the UK. I later identified a further four Accelerated Christian Education schools which, according to their Ofsted reports, had received money in this way.

This was all roundly ignored by the media, apart from a piece in Nursery World which made exactly no difference. But following my discovery, the BHA put in a Freedom of Information request to every local authority in the country to find out how widespread this funding was. They ended up identifying 67 nurseries of concern. And because this list included some Islamic schools, this time the media took notice.

All of which resulted in the new Education Secretary announcing that toddlers are “at risk from extremism”. The BBC is reporting:

Councils are to be given powers to stop funding early-years providers with links to extremism, Education Secretary Nicky Morgan has announced…

Funding would be withheld from establishments that teach creationism as scientific fact…

Early-years children will be taught about learning right from wrong, learning to take turns and share, and to challenge negative attitudes and stereotypes.

Negative attitudes and stereotypes, you say? What, like saying women’s tools include mixing bowls and spoons, while men’s tools include power tools?

This new legislation is surely the end of public money going to ACE nurseries. The ACE nursery curriculum gives children workbooks with the word SCIENCE on the cover in giant letters, and inside they have pictures of Adam and Eve, and activities about the six days of creation. Combined with the gender stereotypes in the curriculum, there is no way anyone could plausibly argue that ACE complies with the guidelines. Job done.

Congratulations everyone. This is our first big campaigning win.

Outside of ACE nurseries, though, I’m interested to see how this plays out. If the wording of the guidelines will be that creationism cannot be taught “as scientific fact”, I think there will be some weasel room. In fact, if that is the final wording, it doesn’t seem very helpful.

There can’t be many nurseries in the country where creationism is taught “as scientific fact”. I doubt, apart from in ACE’s absurd booklets, whether the word science is much used.

The Telegraph quotes a government source as saying “We are absolutely not saying, ‘You can’t teach Bible stories’.” And this is quite right. If they ever try to ban teaching Bible stories to children, let me know the date and I’ll show up at the protest march. The problem is in how these stories are presented. I bet there are tons of nurseries where the term ‘science’ is never used, but teachers read from the book of Genesis and either imply or explicitly state that the stories are literally true. Is this going to be allowed?

This is why using the phrase “scientific fact” is unclear. There’s no way evolution can be scientifically valid, and at the same time the book of Genesis be literally true. If you can’t teach young-Earth creationism as scientifically true, you can’t consistently teach it as theologically true either. I doubt the government has the guts to get into that debate, because it raises some really difficult questions about freedom of religion.


Next question: How are the councils going to be identifying these creationist nurseries? Presumably the schools won’t be coming forward to the authorities and saying “We are extremists, so please discontinue our funding”. They’ll be relying on inspectors, then. And inspections of creationist schools tend to be… poor.

Last week’s Times Education Supplement carried this article: ‘Ofsted fails to acknowledge or address the value-judgements involved in inspecting the curriculum‘. In it, Colin Richards, a former schools inspector and advisor to Ofsted, argues that the new guidelines for schools don’t really require inspectors to evaluate the curriculum. And in extremist schools, the curriculum is exactly the problem.

This is in part why ACE schools have been getting away with murder: They’re teaching rubbish, but the inspectors are primarily there to check that the school is following procedures properly. Richards is talking about Free Schools and academies, but independent schools have the same amount of curricular autonomy (indeed, the whole point of Free Schools is to give them the freedom which allegedly allows independent schools to thrive).

In his determination to “free” his academies and free schools, Gove allowed them to opt out of the misnamed national curriculum as long as the curriculum they provide is broad and balanced. Part of that strategy involves ensuring that Ofsted does not include the curriculum as one of the main focuses of school inspection. As a result, detailed judgements about the quality of the curriculum do not feature prominently – or, often, do not feature at all – in school inspection reports apart from anodyne, “coarse-grained” references to a broad and balanced curriculum and to spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Yet it was the fine-grain of the curriculum, the content of lessons, assemblies and other activities, and the values permeating them, that proved to be at the heart of the Trojan Horse affair. This crucially important dimension was missed by inspectors in those Birmingham schools as, initially, they myopically pursued the flawed, almost “curriculum-free” inspection framework.

Until this is fixed—until the curriculum in ACE schools is inspected thoroughly and critically—ACE schools will be able to ignore independent school standards.

Related posts:

About these ads

About jonnyscaramanga

I grew up as a Christian fundamentalist in the UK. Now I am writing a book and blog about what that's like, and what fundamentalists believe.

Posted on August 11, 2014, in Accelerated Christian Education, Atheism, Christianity, Creationism, Education, Faith Schools, Fundamentalism, School of Tomorrow and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 17 Comments.

  1. Reblogged this on A Tale Unfolds and commented:
    You want to know why I utterly despise religion?
    Go read Johnny’s outstanding blog and recognise the sterling work this man is doing.
    This is what the insidious, sick-minded religious are trying to do to kids.

    I don’t care what form of god-belief you believe in, you can stick it in your ear.

  2. Well done, man. Truly! One person can make a difference?

  3. I think hanging out with all these atheists on wordpress is starting to have an effect on me.
    I can;t feel anything but happy for th4e success you and your readers accomplished here.
    When it comes to teaching my children about God, I want it to be my wife and I who do that. Not some nanny form a daycare.

  4. archaeopteryx1

    Good work, Jonny, but obviously only the tip of the iceberg. Here’s a site you could peruse for days, comprised of stories of young adults who, as children, were home-schooled for the purpose of shielding them from the “horrors” of anti-biblical ideas:

  5. Really excellent news Jonny; there’s no doubt your work has made a difference. Best wishes.

  6. I see that CMI have been having a go at the BHA on their website (not over this specific issue):

  7. Well done Jonny!!!!

  8. What is sad is an otherwise favorite lefty blogger of mine, Ian Welsh, was COMPLAINING about this. Some lefties are blind about religious oppression (especially about “the community’s” demand to have fundamentalist Madrassas in the Midlands, but also in cases like this). I don’t know why I didn’t comment on that post, as Mr. Welsh otherwise fights a good fight. :(

  1. Pingback: This Week in Religion and Skepticism | Evangelically Atheist

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,025 other followers

%d bloggers like this: